Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm
Amendment to Chapter I of Title 4 of NYCRR (Rules for the Classified Service). [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:30 am
Main, Braking the Rules: Why State Courts Should Not Replicate Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 67 Case W. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
In changes that have been five years in the making, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure go into effect today, December 1, 2015. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Parker of George Mason University School of Law has just posted an article entitled Postponing the 2007 'Restyling' Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
October 2009, further amendments made to the Rules of Civil Procedure Ontario Regulation 394/09. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:22 pm
See In re Amends. to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, 75 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 2011). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:31 am
Yesterday the ILB posted this entry re proposed amendments to Indiana court rules. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
See In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure -- Electronic Discovery, ____ So.3d ____, 2012 Fla. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n.12 (11th Cir. 2009) Next, the district court noted that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 21 and 42 – the two Federal Rules addressing severance – are distinct. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am
Outcry from many in the legal community has caused a number of groups to consider whether the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) should be amended. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am
Outcry from many in the legal community has caused a number of groups to consider whether the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) should be amended. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:29 pm
On June 6, 2012, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an Order amending the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure to include e-discovery provisions. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
In Arizona, the civil procedural rules we apply are found in the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure (ARFLP). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:00 am
Faculty Jurisdiction (Amendment) Rules 2023 (1) (GS 2310) Faculty Jurisdiction (Am) Rules – Explanatory Notes (1) (GS 2310X) Note: Pages 4 to 33 of the Explanatory Notes include the marked-up text of the Faculty Jurisdiction (Amendment) Rules 2022, which predates the proposed amendments on contested heritage. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
It states:In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.Despite the clear and unequivocal language preserving the right to jury trial, this right has been significantly diminished by the summary judgment procedure in federal… [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
No longer would Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow full discovery of draft expert reports and require broad disclosure of any communications between an expert and trial counsel, as has been the case ever since the rule's revision in 1993. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 10:09 am
Article by Craig Ball posted on Law.com, Dec. 27, 2006: “The last time the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to deal with electronic evidence, eight-track tapes were the hot technology, the Internet and cell phones were the stuff of science fiction and computers were room-sized behemoths owned by corporations, universities and governments. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Some of these ideas are being incrementally adopted in amendments to the Federal Rules. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:51 am
I am concerned that proposals to further amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may cross the line from procedural to substantive. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:41 am
Constitution states: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [read post]
