Search for: "In Re Application for Water Rights"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
The Board disagreed: "applicant is, in effect, attempting to obtain exclusive rights to all labels and the like that would be identical inverted versions of each other. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
" [Are applicant's waters carbonated? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
Van Horn fractured her right tibial plateau. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:02 am
p. 49 (citing In re Water Use Permit Applications (Waiahole), 84 Haw. 97, 9 P.3d 409 (2000); In re Water Use Permit Applications, 105 Haw. 1, 93 P.3d 643 (2004); In re Water Use Permit Applications, 113 Haw. 52, 147 P.3d 836 (2006)). [read post]
26 May 2024, 3:00 am
State officials determined the company has been unlawfully diverting water without valid water rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
Beyond any weather forecast, it should have been a bad day in Luxembourg for Melt Water, the Lithuanian company which lost a couple of days ago on absolute grounds both trade mark cases T-69/14and T-70/14 on appeal to the General Court.Back in 2012 Melt Water applied to register a figurative sign for 'MELT WATER Original' (depicted on the right) and a three-dimensional sign representing a bottle shape (below, left), as Community trade… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:49 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Application of)In re Andrew S. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 pm
This is the content of the forthcoming Journal of Water Law which you might find interesting: Water law a5 lo res View more documents from movanet. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
It will be difficult for municipal land use boards to do this, given the due process requirements and rights of interested parties to participate in hearings regarding applications for development. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 3:10 pm
The most recent case involving the long-standing controversy over the Waiahole Ditch, In re Water Use Permit Applications, ___ Haw. ___, 147 P.3 836 (Nov. 29, 2006) was not the usual blockbuster opinion or the latest in water rights, interim instream flow standards, and the public trust doctrine. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
Under the doctrine of res judicata, a valid final judgment on the merits bars a subsequent action by the parties or their privies on the same cause of action; whether the cause of action is the same for res judicata purposes depends on whether it involves the same “primary right” to be free from a particular injury, regardless of the legal theory on which liability is based. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
See In re Kumar, 418 F.3d 1361, 1367–68 (Fed. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Sierra Land & Water Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
We’re continuing to collect incident reports from water protectors on the ground, and we’re keeping an eye out for any signs of cell-site simulator use. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:54 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights)In re D.N. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:28 am
EPA, No. 10-1062, the case in which Idaho property owners are asserting their right to challenge the agency's assertion via a "compliance order" that a portion of their land are "wetlands" and that they violated the Clean Water Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
As such, re-sloping the road was within the scope of his rights to make reasonable repairs to the way. [read post]
31 May 2023, 1:47 pm
The court concluded that all the requirements for the application of res judicata have been met and therefore granted summary judgment to the defendant. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:40 am
The Superior Court (application of Indian Child Welfare Act) In re M.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
Dhanasinghe.There are around 600 inmates on whom the re-appealing of the cases has been cancelled due to the nature of their crimes and 400 prisoners have re-appealed against their verdicts. [read post]
