Search for: "In Re Baycol Products Litigation"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 3:13 am
Motors Corp., 243 F.3d 441, 444-45 (8th Cir.2001); In re Baycol Products Litigation, 532 F.Supp.2d 1029. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
”In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 1997 WL 80527 (E.D. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm
In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 671 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Fla. 2009)); see also In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation, 532 F. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
App. 1994); In re Baycol Products Litigation, 2003 WL 22331294, at *2-3 (D. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Ohio 2003); In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation, 218 F.R.D. 197 (D. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've blogged before about the importance of both sides in personal injury litigation - and especially drug/medical device product liability litigation involving the learned intermediary rule - having equal rights to talk to treating/prescribing physicians. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, 343 Fed.Appx. 671 (2d Cir. 2009) Baycol In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See In re A.H. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2007 WL 3334339 (E.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
In re Baycol Products Liability Litigation, 495 F. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:29 am
Here's why.Start with a product recall. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
All 10 lawsuits are still pending, so they're being fought vigorously. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:19 am
The SCOTUS ruling reversed a prior Eighth Circuit decision entitled In Re Baycol Products Liability Products Litigation, 593 F. 3d 716 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Likewise, the court in In re Baycol Products Litigation, 532 F. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Against this avalanche of authority, you’d expect pharmaceutical litigation in Michigan to have disappeared. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
[T]o succeed on either the unjust enrichment or breach of warranty claims, Plaintiffs would have to demonstrate that they were either injured by [the drug], or that [the drug] did not provide them any health benefits.In re Baycol Products Litigation, 218 F.R.D. 197, 213-14 (D. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:14 am
In warranty cases, Illinois has dispensed with so-called "vertical privity" in personal injury litigation. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In re Heparin Product Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 1059660, at *9 (N.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
See In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
