Search for: "In Re Bristol Associates, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: US: District Court S D New York: ‘Isolated DNA’ patents fail to claim patentable subject matter: Association for Molecular Pathology and ACLU v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Bristol-Myers Squibb, 97 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The authors of this guest post are: Doug Greene, BakerHostetler, Leader, Securities and Governance Litigation Team; Genevieve York-Erwin, BakerHostetler, Partner; Mike Tomasulo, Baldwin Risk Partners, Managing Partner, Management Liability National Practice Leader: Emily Baxter,  BakerHostetler, Associate; and Alex Karambelas, BakerHostetler, Associate. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:00 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
Global Global – General Fail to protect associated IC (no. 5 in our list of IP mistakes) (IP Think Tank) An open approach to IP risks – Onzo approach (IP finance) WTO GI discussions gather speed, parties watchful until negotiations (IP Watch) That IP advice for SMEs: the advisers respond (IPKat) Discovery of Coca-cola’s secret formula? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
However, it appears generally acknowledged that this trend halted in 2009 with a decision titled In re Bose Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme is upon us. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 2009 WL 5216982, at *5-6 (D.N.J. [read post]