Search for: "In Re Christiansen"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Later in the month, the Second Circuit reached a similar conclusion in Christiansen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 5:59 am
Only 34% deserve re-election. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:37 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in the case of Christiansen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:19 am
Here’s how the 1st DCA explained this point, relying heavily on a similar 1986 case out of Arizona: [I]n In re Strobel, 149 Ariz. 213, 717 P.2d 892, 893–94 (1986), Mr. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
Christiansen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:21 am
Christiansen — Banking/Regulatory — Washington, D.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am
The Second Circuit sucked some of the wind out of those sails in Christiansen v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:03 am
Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2329); Christiansen, No. 13-00297 (N.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am
Do you think so poorly of the Second Circuit judges as to believe they won’t realize you’re blowing smoke? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "The Human Rights Obligations of Stet-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structure and Principles in National and International Law and Policy," which appears in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational law 50(4):827-888 (2017). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
Kaul (1993), for example, cites a 1960s follow-up of over 2900 Danish sex offenders (Christiansen, 1965) in which just 10% were convicted of another sex offence over a period of 12 to 24 years, although time at risk does not appear to have been considered in this study. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
