Search for: "In Re Dupont"
Results 21 - 40
of 569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:45 pm
In re E.I.DuPont DeNemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A.1973). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
To put that in context, my three year old will be in graduate school (hopefully) by the time Kolon can begin any effort to re-enter this market. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:50 am
’” In re Dixie Rests., Inc., 105 F.3d 1405,1406 (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:49 am
In re E.I. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
US | DuPont Sues Heraeus for Alleged Solar Patent Infringement http://bit.ly/q4aeRO British American Tobacco Appeals to High Court to Obtain Legal Advice Given to Australian Govt re Tobacco Packaging on.wsj.com/q7SwVj .XXX domain now active – another domain for brand owners to monitor bit.ly/mWfXI0 Booze Giant Bets $10 Million on Whisky-Based Bioenergy Plant onforb.es/roWwVv LinkedIn’s Europe Competitor Viadeo Opens API, Bring Developer Contest to US nyti.ms/nKrUqb… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm
Monsanto won a hefty $1 billion against DuPont in a case about genetically-modified [...] [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:33 am
We’re campaign people! [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 12:22 pm
Of course, once DuPont heard Bilott was investigating the substance, they quickly “re-examined” it and determined safe levels to be exponentially higher than they had previously state. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:09 am
" In re Eldorado Resorts LLC, Serial No. 88514634 (July 8, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:15 am
Cir. 2018) (“Dupont v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
Non-Compete and Trade Secrets News for the week ended April 21, 2017***DuPont Employee Charged with Trade Secret TheftNo company has had bigger problems with trade secret theft than DuPont. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:59 pm
This court reviews the Board’s factual findings on each DuPont factor for substantial evidence, In re Pacer Tech., 338 F.3d 1348, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Milewski Ripoff Report Hires New General Counsel Ripoff Report Responds re. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:59 pm
In re Ruschig, 379 F.2d 990 (CCPA 1967).... [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
However, since Rider 11 had expired and hadn't been re-enacted after the end of the 2004-2005 biennium, the Court of Appeals dismissed DuPont's contention on that issue as moot. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
The Board dismissed the opposition, finding that the first DuPont factor favored iFit, but deeming the second factor dispositive: "Opposer has failed to show that the parties’ goods and services are related, or that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In re Pacer Tech., 338 F.3d 1348, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:32 pm
The‘Pension' booklet in your green Benefits Binder explains the Du Pont formulas; however, nothing written re offsets as each would be different. [read post]
