Search for: "In Re Grand Jury 89-2" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
Grand Trunk Ry, 55 N.H. 84 (1874) (reversing traumatic cancer verdict on other grounds) New Mexico White v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
” Statement of facts, § 2 (emphasis added) Bragg: “Participants in the scheme took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the reimbursements. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am by MBettman
In this case, the facts necessary to support the 2016 Grand Jury indictment could not have been discovered despite the exercise of due diligence until Soto appeared and confessed to the actual details of his son’s death. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
"   The Target Children's Area will keep 2-year-olds to 9-year-olds captivated with book readings, a performance of children's classics by the Troupe Theatre and author signings. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am by MBettman
(Double jeopardy hinges on the identical nature of the different causes of actions brought by the state, not on factual evidence submitted to the jury. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
[Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns] This post describes and analyzes nineteenth century state statutes on Bowie knives. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard, courts look at “what a… [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 23, 2009)Affirming Jury's finding of liability on fem's gender/failure-to-hire claim; affirming denial of punitive damages; $164K+ in comps vacated and remanded4th CircuitØ Townsend v. [read post]