Search for: "In Re Interest of Br"
Results 21 - 40
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
” Appellant’s Br. at 47. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:14 pm
” Appellant’s Br. 16. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
Yes, in the case of In re Thomas, 511 BR 89 (6th Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
” Appellee’s En Banc Br. 43. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 11:37 am
Res. 232, 96th Cong., 93 Stat. 1438 (Dec. 21, 1979) (pro forma sessions for both houses). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Some pretty interesting stuff, it turns out, much of which can be of use on the drug side of the preemption wars. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
” In re Rouffet, 149 F.3d 1350, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:17 pm
See Appellants’ Br. 45–46 (citing In re Donaldson Co.,16 F.3d 1189, 1194–95 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Wyeth br. at 39-40.In the part of Wyeth's brief that's of most interest to non-vaccine defense counsel, it discusses the Vaccine Act’s relationship to Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment k (1965). [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 8:31 am
Appellant’s Br. 15. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
The case IN RE: QAPSULE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. gives an interesting walk-through of case law, including a citation to Yale Lock Mfg. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
PhRMA amicus br. at 3. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Kent br. at 11. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Conflicts of interest, real or potential. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm
” In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1331 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
If you're a long-distance caregiver, consider calling the doctor directly if you have the necessary legal permissions. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 3:05 am
In New York, there is a motion to dismiss in the interest of justice, a so-called Clayton Motion stemming from its derivation from a case handled by Eastern District federal district court Judge Fred Block, which has since been reduced to statute. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Pataki, 408 F.3d at 87 [New York has an "interest in monitoring gun licensees"] and 408 F.3d at 91 ["(t)he State has a substantial and legitimate interest ... in insuring the safety of the general public from individuals who, by their conduct, have shown themselves to be lacking the essential temperament or character which should be present in one entrusted with a dangerous instrument" [quoting In re Pelose, 5,3 A.D.2d 645, 384 N.Y.S.2d 499 (2d… [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 1:47 pm
N.D.N.Y. 1993), as decided by state property law, In re Brown, 168 BR 331 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 8:09 am
N.D.N.Y. 1993), as decided by state property law, In re Brown, 168 BR 331 (Bankr. [read post]
