Search for: "In Re Judicial Ethics Opinion 2011-3"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm
In this case it is worth considering the comments of a Justice who wrote the majority opinion for the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Marriage of Davenport (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1507 Marriage of Davenport was published May 4, 2011. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Citing the dictum in Matrixx Initiatives[2] as though it were a holding is not only ethically dubious, but also ignores the legal and judicial context of the Court’s statements[3]. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
I have been considering the recent abolition of the system of administrative detentions, re-education through labor (劳动教养), commonly known as laojiao (劳教). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
The need for revisions to the third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (RMSE) has been apparent since its publication in 2011. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
This instability thus manifests itself in contests for control of regulatory space--through robust projects of legalization and judicialization of the societal sphere in general, and the obligations of enterprises specifically--or through the privatization of the legal sphere as enterprises themselves are deputized to undertake the role once reserved to states. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
(See my previous column with Jennifer Koshan on judicial education here.) [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
”[3] The Court thus showed that it was well aware that well-ground (and thus admissible) opinions may not have been previously published, and that the existence of peer review was simply a potential aid in answering the essential question, whether the proponent of a proffered opinion has shown “the scientific validity of a particular technique or methodology on which an opinion is premised. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
In re Schering Plo [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Hyg. 689, 691 (2011). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Yet, these provisions have remained in effect for over half a century, without raising any judicial doubts. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
For more on disqualification motions, you’ll want to read Judicial Ethics Bench Guide: Answers to frequently Asked questions. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence Certainly, judicial thinking evolved since 1993, and the decision in Daubert. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
(I think Robert admires Taft almost as much as I admire Dean Guido Calabresi).[20] Yet, as Robert also observes, “Few now remember that Taft had forever altered the nature of the chief justiceship, the Supreme Court, or the federal judiciary[,]….his efforts at judicial reform or the construction of the contemporary Supreme Court building”[,] or “the judicial landmarks he thought he had established. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am
We’re Just Getting Going - http://tinyurl.com/42h3ctg (Chris Dale) What Are We Waiting For? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Ry., 802 F.Supp.2d 950 (2011). [read post]
