Search for: "In Re Judicial Ethics Opinion 2011-3" Results 21 - 40 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a general matter, the cases tend to fall into one of three categories: (1) lawsuits against companies that experienced a COVID outbreak in one of its facilities (such as, for example, cruise ship lines and private prison systems); (2) lawsuits against companies that made public statements suggesting the companies could profit from the pandemic (such as vaccine development companies, as well as manufacturers of personal protective equipment or diagnostic tests); and (3) companies… [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am by Jason Rantanen
” (These decisions are excluded from coverage to the extent they decide past issues in specific cases, E.O. 13892 § 2(c)(iv); they’re covered only to the extent an agency relies on them for future effect.) [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Barrack has been investigated for potentially violating the law requiring people who try to influence American policy or opinion at the direction of foreign governments or entities to disclose their activities to the Justice Department. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
How this strategy was exerted was wrought with ethical and partisan dilemmas, Cases of election fraud soared during the subsequent election campaign. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:02 pm
WGE is composed of members of the Coalition for Peace and Ethics of whom Flora Sapio, Larry Catá Backer, and James Korman have taken a leading role; its work product is collaborative. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am by Margaret Taylor
” To put an even finer point on it, this week Trump himself told reporters, “We’re fighting all of the subpoenas. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Judges write opinions, in which they give reasons for their conclusions. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Circuit heard oral argument in In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Dubious Scholarship The more serious problem with Cranor’s article is not his ethically strained pronouncements about financial interests, but the dubious scholarship he and his colleagues advance to thwart judicial gatekeeping of even more dubious expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
And although we are quite adept at interpreting and applying these rules in creative fashions, we’re not always that great at following rules when we’re required to do so. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
That means that sometimes you will have an opinion or produce an insight with respect to which there may be objection or disagreement. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:33 pm
These systems have acquired official recognition through international instruments, the most important of which might be the 2011 U.N. [read post]