Search for: "In Re Marriage of Baker"
Results 21 - 40
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
So, if you're right about that, why should we even entertain the question whether to overrule Smith? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Politics is re-forming. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
The baker Jack Phillips, for example, “stopped baking wedding cakes altogether, sacrificing about 40% of his business. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
The bakers all turned down the jobs on the grounds that the message sent by the proposed cakes was offensive or hateful. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:12 pm
Microsoft's Brad Smith, meanwhile, wins the prize for best marriage of business self-interest and Zeitgeist in the twenty-first century. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am
Hodges, in which the justices struck down state bans on same-sex marriage, to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:07 pm
We’re not going to agree, but that doesn’t mean that society hasn’t got room for all of us. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Bernie Sanders Says He Will Slow His Campaign Pace After Heart Attack ENM News – Sydney Ember and Jonathan Martin (New York Times) | Published: 10/8/2019 U.S. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
FEE-SHIFTING BY BENCH AND BAR IN TEXAS HENCEFORTH TO BE GUIDED BY THE LODESTAR Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am
The Justices did not resolve the religious rights issue in the prior case, because they chose to return it to state courts in Colorado for a new look at the reasons state officials had ruled against the baker who was involved. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
But I can tell you that this is the first time since 2013 that the court has relisted a petition seeking to overrule Feres, and before that it was 2011, which was so long ago that I actually hyphenated “re-list,” like I was T. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
For example, Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, stated that “any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons in effect be allowed to put up signs saying ‘no goods or services will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages,’ something that would impose a serious stigma on gay persons. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm
Unless you’re a public employer generally First Amendment speech protections don’t apply to the workplace. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And even in the realm of marriage, the Court may expand on this term’s Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK Thomas L. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
” Hitler did not kill 6,000,000 Jews by refusing to patronize Jewish bakers. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
” The court further recognized the danger of free speech and freedom of religion claims that the bakery advanced in this case, stating that: “any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons in effect be allowed to put up signs saying ‘no goods or services will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages,’… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:02 pm
But, respectfully, I do not see how we might rescue the Commission from its error....The "other bakers" referred to some other cases in which the Commission did not find a violation (such as where the baker refused to make a cake with an anti-same-sex-marriage message). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:17 pm
"[O]n at least three other occasions the Civil Rights Division considered the refusal of bakers to create cakes with images that conveyed disapproval of same-sex marriage, along with religious text. [read post]
