Search for: "In Re Marriage of Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 7:21 pm
Located On: Fisher & Phillips, LLP Most Popular State Law Article How Does California's Same-Sex Marriage Decision Impact Employers? [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Legal historians, you may be stuck behind a newspaper (or twitter.com) this summer, but if you’re not satisfied with the history of the present, check out these book reviews:In the Washington Post, E.J. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
Phillips Petrol. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
In contrast, the burden imposed on Phillips for the exercise of his rights of religion and speech includes the loss of his business license, heavy fines and mandatory participation in various re-education programs suitable only in totalitarian regimes. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Observations Arising from the Decision on Jurisdiction in Re Evans”. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
It would have taken a very bold federal judge to reach these decisions in the 1990s; today, it's almost a no-brainer--especially when one looks at the perversity of Don't-Ask (in discharging service members with valued skills while we're fighting two wars) or the weakness of the arguments offered against same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
Would Phillips’ baking a cake make him complicit in supporting gay marriage, or would it just make him a baker? [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Rather, the Court concluded that during the process of reviewing Phillips’ claims, some of the members of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission made statements that “cast doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the Commission’s adjudication of Phillips’ case. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:48 am
You’re screwing off. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:33 am
Last month I told you about Phillip Sherman, who’d left his cell phone at a McDonald’s. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 4:04 am
If not, you’re not. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:45 pm
I seem to recall a case where the Court of Appeal expressed consternation that there was no money left for further appeals work or, indeed, left for the parties themselves, because such money as the parties had enjoyed in their marriage had been consumed by the legal process. 4. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Graham Phillips GUEST CAST: Peter Florrick................................. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
You won't lose any votes next time over this, but do you really believe you're going to gain any? [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
The Phillips precedent could have aided those claims.) [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:34 am
“People need to know what they’re getting,” said Hetty Rosenstein, state director of the Communications Workers of America. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:06 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesWIRTW #283 (the “vaycay” edition)WIRTW #282 (the “shut yo’ mouth” edition)WIRTW #281 (the "is it live or is it Memorex" edition) [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:06 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesWIRTW #285 (the “back to school” edition)WIRTW #283 (the “vaycay” edition)WIRTW #282 (the “shut yo’ mouth” edition) [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:42 pm
Phillips to do just that, ordering him to sketch, sculpt, and hand-paint cakes that celebrate a view of marriage in violation of his religious.And Justice Sotomayor and Justice Ginsburg both try to jump in with the first question. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
And by monstrous, we’re talking potentially billions of dollars of exposure. [read post]
