Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 21 - 40 of 891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during March 2024 The ten consistory court judgments were circulated in March included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Other This review also reviews: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” These warnings “shall comprise the top 50 percent of the front and rear panels of the package” of cigarettes and “at least 20 percent of the area of [any] advertisement .... [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:27 pm by John Ross
Dissent: Orders denying immunity in other contexts are reviewable before final judgment; this should be, too. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:46 pm
Classification rules for high-risk AI systems (Art. 6) High risk AI systems are those: used as a safety component or a product covered by EU laws in Annex II AND required to undergo a third-party conformity assessment under those Annex II laws; ORthose under Annex III use cases (below), except if: the AI system performs a narrow procedural task;improves the result of a previously completed human activity;detects decision-making patterns or deviations from prior decision-making patterns and is… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Much like medical jargon or terms for any other area of specialized knowledge, if a person hasn’t had reason to encounter a legal term before, they wouldn’t have reason to know what the various words and phrases mean. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B. (2nd—B331989) Petitions for Writ of Review—Untimely Petitions—Court of Appeal dismissed applicant’s Petition for Writ of Review as untimely, when applicant failed… Appeals Board Panel Decisions Bradford (Eiren) v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The panel’s ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B . (3rd—C098844) Medical Treatment—Apportionment—Permanent Disability—WCAB, af ter granting reconsideration in split panel opinion, affirmed decision in which WCJ found that applicant who suffered brain seizure while employed as paramedic/firefighter on 7/6/2016 as result of interaction… Other WCAB Decision Denied Judicial Review Magic Mountain, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:01 pm by Neil Schoenherr
Survivors there need psycho-social support and medical care of course. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Here, the trial court didn’t allow defendant to be released on bail and a three-justice panel finds no abuse of discretion. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Is It Time to Re-Fuel Airline Regulation? [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Alan Brackett
After reviewing the medical evidence, the WCAB found the settlement amount to be inadequate, as there was a possibility of future shoulder surgery and the medical reports did not address permanent disability. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2018 President Trump jacked up tariffs on solar panels to "protect the domestic solar panel industry. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:35 pm by John Ross
We're expediting the appeal, though, and the merits panel is free to disagree with us. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:19 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The IMR reviewer concluded that this type of medication switch is appropriate when a medication is not working adequately. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]