Search for: "In Re Oral Testimony of a Witness"
Results 21 - 40
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 4:47 am
Since we're ten minutes to 4 now.THE COURT: Okay. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Adam Liptak has an article in the New York Times on the January 11th oral argument scheduled in Briscoe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In this case, counsel for the union member submitted that the issue of credibility of a witness constituted an exceptional circumstance. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:37 am
Thereafter the court will resolve the witness question immediately, without the benefit of oral argument. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
In In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:06 am
A deposition is “a witness’s out-of-court testimony that is reduced to writing (usually by a court reporter) for later use in court or for discovery purposes. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
“On the trial of every action seeking equitable relief, oral testimony shall be taken when desired by either party. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
Proc. 43 might provide a way to satisfy the proceduralists; Rule 43(c) provides that “When a motion relies on facts outside the record, the court may hear the matter on affidavits or may hear it in wholly or partly on oral testimony or on depositions. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
When is a litigator thinking most keenly about a specific witness’s testimony? [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
During his first criminal trial, the court ordered witnesses not to introduce testimony alleging that Anderson had previously bitten and strangled an ex-girlfriend. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
When we say a witness is “competent” to testify we mean that the witness has the minimal ability and adequate qualification[1]to testify. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:45 am
Depositions play a key role in civil lawsuits, often revealing crucial witness testimony. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am
The parties are supposed to prepare direct, cross, re-direct, and re-cross questions before the questions are propounded to the witness. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
If you're involved in drug and device (or any) product liability litigation, you're dealing with expert witnesses. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
Holder, No. 08-495, the Supreme Court held oral argument on Monday, April 27, 2009. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:43 am
The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding Murphy’s testimony. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In contrast to the OD the board therefore considered it appropriate to hear Dr Wallukat and Dr Kunze as witnesses because their testimony could affect the outcome of the proceedings.[44] The following is a selection of statements made by Dr Wallukat and Dr Kunze during their testimonies. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
This is a reminder that oral testimony is not always needed to assess credibility. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:59 pm
The court heard argument in the case Wednesday, and the oral argument recording has been posted on the court’s website. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:53 am
New Amendment To Rule 26 Concerning Expert Disclosures If you're involved in drug and device (or any) product liability litigation, you're dealing with expert witnesses. [read post]
