Search for: "In Re PEARSON"
Results 21 - 40
of 487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 8:48 am
We're guessing the former; but we're hoping for the latter. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
(In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1405 (CCPA 1974)). [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
She's not a terrorist," Pearson said. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
© Mark Pearson 2012 This post originally appeared on the Journlaw blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:48 pm
Pearson will likely appeal. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:25 am
"We're talking to all sorts of people about different [...] [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
... unless, of course, you're a USDA inspector of internet link sausages, in which case I'm unavailable and in a meeting. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:51 pm
They’re back again. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:17 am
How did Pearson’s appeal of the pants case go? [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:53 am
Amygdala observes, of the $12,000 settlement offer that Pearson spurned from the Chungs: Which is to say, if you're a lawyer, or just knowledgeable about legal phrasing and documents, and willing to spend a certain amount of time generating and mailing documents, you can wind up being offered $12,000 if you're sufficiently obnoxious and persistent, no matter how feeble, frivolous, and meretricious your claim is. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 9:43 pm
Pearson still has a lawsuit pending against the District of Columbia for not being re-appointed to his administrative law judgeship. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
And they do it by looking at the fringe frivolous cases (anyone remember the ridiculous coverage of Roy Pearson’s pants lawsuit?) [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Beth (understandably) declines to do so, and after mistakenly believing that Beth stood him up for an important work dinner, Randall leaves her a voice message saying, “I hope you’re off having fun talking about how to teach bored housewives how to twirl better. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:20 am
Pearson neither admitted nor denied the Commission’s findings. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:03 am
So even if they win, they're bound to lose. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 4:20 am
If you’re not smiling now, you’re not human. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:59 am
SCOTUSBlog's Petitions We're Watching includes three qualified immunity cases. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:16 am
As noted in his email distribution list, the decision in In re Milton, 2006 WL 4559500 (Com'r dec. 2006)(Pearson, Dir., Off. of Petitions) held:"The decision on the original decision dismissed Petitioner's request to withdraw the holding of abandonment, on the grounds that Petitioner's reliance on an oral promise is expressly prohibited by 37 C.F.R. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:17 am
The Law Blog has a call into Judge Pearson. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:00 pm
If you're in D.C. on July 24th, you can attend a fundraising event for them. [read post]
