Search for: "In Re Pension Cases" Results 21 - 40 of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 11:58 am by Nicolas Castillo, Managing CPA
The US-UK Tax Treaty (Bear with us, we’re about to get technical.) [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
This afternoon, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument on the biggest case on its civil docket, In re Pension Reform Litigation. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:52 am by Elan Mendel
CA pension fund re-hires State Street despite lawsuitCalifornia Public Employees’ Retirement System, the pension fund behind the first lawsuit against embattled custody bank State Street Corp, has just signed a new three-year deal with the bank, according to a report by Bloomberg. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by Giannis Waymouth
While they’re at it, I’d also like HMRC to stop penalising split pension transfers. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:38 pm by Mark Maddox
Investment giant Morgan Stanley also is the subject of a high-profile case involving pension funds and risky investing strategies. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
It provided an in-depth discussion of California’s leading case on military pension shifting, In re Marriage of Krempin (1999) 70 CA4th 1008, and its dissection of the majority rule (22 states, including California, allowing for some equitable remedy to the non-military spouse in the form of support reassessment or redistribution of martial property) and minority rule (5 states allowing for no remedy) nationwide. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Public pension reform effort by the Illinois State Legislature ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of IllinoisIn re Pension Reform Litigation, [Doris Heaton, et al,] v Pat Quinn, Governor, State of Illinois, et al, Supreme Court of Illinois, 2015 IL Docket 118585, In this action the plaintiff contended the Act amending Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) by reducing retirement annuity benefits for individuals who first became members of four of… [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:56 am by Brad Schnure
The bill also specifies that pension forfeiture applies in cases that result in qualifying guilty or nolo contendere pleas, in addition to convictions. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 6:33 am by Claude Marchessault
Both involve motor vehicles, but in the former case you can pay your fine and drive away, while in the latter you’re obliged to spend time in court and will likely want a lawyer. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The issues before the Court of Appeal were (1) whether the appellant’s rights to a retirement pension should be considered without recourse to the provisions of the GRA (2) if so, what would be the effect of Directive 79/7 as interpreted by the Richards case (see below) (3) If Directive 79/7 applied to the facts of this case and it was held that the UK legislation and case law (prior to the GRA) is discriminatory with regard to acquired gender and… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:08 am by Nigel Williams
Extra tax on dividends may encourage companies, especially those with pension-fund shareholders, to use the potential dividend money for re-investment. [read post]
What happens to your children if your ex-spouse re-marries and leaves all assets – including ones gained from you – to his or her new spouse and family? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:48 am by Peter Vodola
The case is In re Dunlap, Bankruptcy No. 09-75282-SCS and Adversary No. 10-07041-SCS (Bankr. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:57 am by Rick Kabra
But we do know that in most divorce cases, pensions built up over the course of 5, 10, 15 or more years are valuable assets. [read post]
While courts consider pension plans in equitable distribution, that’s not always the case for health insurance coverage. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:16 pm
THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT Overview In addition to requiring corporations to more fully fund their pension plans, the Pension Protection Act ("PPA"), which was passed on August 17, 2006, provides or extends numerous tax benefits that could affect you or your employer. [read post]