Search for: "In Re Pontes"
Results 21 - 40
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 3:40 am
In re Boyy Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
The Board observed that the CAFC has held that "something more" must be shown to prove the relatedness of alcoholic beverages and restaurant services, In re Coors Brewing Co., 68 USPQ2d 1059, 1063 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:09 am
This is the world we're living in. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:52 am
Du Pont – you’re still with it, you know who you are and where you are, so why worry if you decide to change your beneficiaries to recognize the kindness of a friend or the love of a new partner? [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:22 am
Sometimes the Board's determination under Section 2(d) comes down to a single du Pont factor, regardless of the makeup of the Board panel and despite any cosmetic distinctions made by the losing party. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:07 pm
I give the prize to the aqueduct at Pont du Gard. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:18 am
The first du Pont factor, the dissimilarity of the marks, led the Board to reverse a Section 2(d) refusal of the KID TENNIS & Design mark (shown below) for various clothing items ("KID TENNIS" disclaimed). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:45 am
In re Hammers USA, Inc., Serial No. 85611025 (February 22, 2016) [not precedential].The marks: The Board observed that the design in the cited mark merely reinforces the meaning of the word HAMMER. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:27 am
In re Cumberland Valley Financial Corp., Serial No. 86827085 (April 5, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Hightower). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: The "customer sophistication" argument seems to me to be a makeweight that the Board can use to tip the du Pont scale in whichever direction it wants to end up. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
In re Hard Rok Equipment, Inc., Serial No. 87581245 (January 7, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).The Board agreed with Examining Attorney Jonathon Schlegelmilch that HARDROK is the dominant element of applicant's mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:52 am
In re All Seasons Feders, Ltd., Serial No. 86699952 (September 6, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw).Because the goods are legally identical, they are presumed to travel in the same, normal trade channels to the same, normal classes of purchasers. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:52 am
In re 8-Brewing LLC, Serial No. 86760527 (October 30, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 2:24 am
In re Lavelle Industries, Inc., Serial No. 87420189 (June 12, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:04 am
In re Inn at St. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:58 am
In re Big Heart Wine, LLC, Serial No. 86376188 (January 20, 2017) [not precedential].The Board found no need to determine whether Italian is familiar to an appreciable segment of American consumers. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 3:21 am
The Board made no mention was of the 13th du Pont factor, or of In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012). [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 3:54 am
., of Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
In re E. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:39 am
" See In re Sumitomo Electric Indus., Ltd., 184 USPQ 365 (TTAB 1974):While this letter of consent does not constitute an agreement of the type involved in the Du Pont case, this does not mean that it is unacceptable herein. [read post]
