Search for: "In Re Proctor"
Results 21 - 40
of 319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 1:17 am
But students have fought back, and often won, and we’re glad to have been on their side. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
We're going to let Concurring Opinions bring the test case. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
We’re not talking about the microwave beeping that your burrito is ready or the proctor’s script for the ACT. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
We’re not talking about the microwave beeping that your burrito is ready or the proctor’s script for the ACT. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
in an unanimous opinion authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court this week ruled in favor of an employee in a discrimination case under the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act, or USERRA. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
in an unanimous opinion authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court this week ruled in favor of an employee in a discrimination case under the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act, or USERRA. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:19 pm
Legal Reasoning (Lourie, Dyk, Reyna)Our analysis in In re The Proctor & Gamble Company, __ F. 3d __, No. 2014-121 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
Give me a proctored exam any day. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 9:01 am
“Room scans,” where students are forced to use their device’s camera to give a 360-degree view of everything around the area in which they’re taking a test, are one of the most invasive aspects of remotely proctored exams. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:06 am
In re POD-NERS (Fed. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:20 pm
It is unfair for students to be forced to respond to potential sanctions before they’re given adequate information about the behavior for which they may be sanctioned. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:26 am
The case is In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 13-cv-2000, MDL 246 (N.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:26 am
The case is In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 13-cv-2000, MDL 246 (N.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
We're working on them for paying clients. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:52 pm
Proctor Heyman Enerio LLP also represented an party in that case. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
If that's the case, they're going to be awfully surprised with today's 8-0 ruling in Staub v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 5:03 am
See Proctor, at 4-. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:59 pm
As for day of exam support, we utilize student proctors in the classroom. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:17 pm
”For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/johnson-v-proctorio-complaintFor more on proctoring surveillance:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/08/proctoring-apps-subject-students-unnecessary-surveillance Contact: CaraGaglianoStaff Attorneycara@eff.org [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm
’” In re Am. [read post]
