Search for: "In Re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules"
Results 21 - 40
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
http://www.oranous.com/florida/MarkSchwab/replybriefSchwab.htm[www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 80289 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, Death Warrant Signed Execution Scheduled for November 15, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
THADIUS DEMENTRIEL CRAWFORD, Appellee. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Proposal of settlement -- Attorney's fees -- An offer of settlement is not invalid for failing to state, as required under Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(2)(F), whether the proposal includes attorney's fees and whether attorney's fees are part of the legal claim, where attorney's fees are not sought in the pleadingsSUSANNE L. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:51 am
The Florida Legislature sets a minimum bond requirement. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 5:00 am
Although they're less sweeping and restrictive than the original proposal, they'll still change the way lawyers advertise in broadcast and print media and on the Internet. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:48 am
As noted by the 4th DCA appellate panel, and reported here, there’s really no current no mechanism under Florida law for resolving the kind of burial dispute represented by this case. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
Washington Mutual Bank (In re Enewally), 368 F.3d 1165, 1171-72 (9th Cir. 2004) and bankruptcy courts in Connecticut, North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Virginia, all of whom rejected hybrid Chapter 13 plans). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:07 am
Rule 9.200 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure allows the appellant (the husband in this case) to “prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means, including the appellant’s recollection. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:07 am
Rule 9.200 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure allows the appellant (the husband in this case) to “prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means, including the appellant’s recollection. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:04 am
That case follows a precedent set in a New Jersey case from 2013 in which an appellate court ruled that a 17-year-old girl could potentially be held liable for car accident injuries that resulted when the 18-year-old boy with whom she was texting crashed. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:04 am
That case follows a precedent set in a New Jersey case from 2013 in which an appellate court ruled that a 17-year-old girl could potentially be held liable for car accident injuries that resulted when the 18-year-old boy with whom she was texting crashed. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
It was noted in the proposed verdict form – at which time the defense objected. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
It was noted in the proposed verdict form – at which time the defense objected. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Plaintiff appealed and the Florida Supreme Court quashed the appeals court’s ruling. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:41 am
We are awaiting multiple decisions in the appellate courts throughout the state of Florida. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:41 am
We are awaiting multiple decisions in the appellate courts throughout the state of Florida. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
WAMSER, and FLORIDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., Appellants, v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:21 am
See generally In re Phoebe Putney Health Sys., Inc., Dkt. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Post-trial – Pierce argues that Smith’s counterclaim was not a “core proceeding” & that the bankruptcy court had no authority to issue final findings of fact and rulings of law (“Final Rulings”) on the counterclaim. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
” “The judge’s second question envisions a scenario where one or more other judges on the same appellate court or appellate panel have a conflict involving a particular proposed amicus curiae. [read post]
