Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
And reasoning that “class counsel and Akorn [we]re looking out for their own interests rather than those of the class,” the Seventh Circuit held that “intervention [wa]s appropriate” and that Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
The specific proposal for the moveable font is a copper bowl on a stand. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In truth, they're best understood to stand for this far-more-modest proposition, which appears in the 1995 OLC opinion on which Trump places the most weight: “[A] statute that does not by its express terms apply to the President may not be applied to the President if doing so would raise a serious question under the separation of powers. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In 2016, Heard fled for divorce from Depp and sought a temporary restraining order alleging physical abuse. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
And the Federal Circuit determined the error was not harmless, as it could not say a proper instruction “would have made no difference to a reasonable jury regarding invalidity. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
The benches apparently replaced box pews when there was interior re-ordering, influenced by the Oxf [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am
Is there a gag order in place? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
If you can’t set aside the rule and you’re not a regulated party, how is their injury redressable in this suit and why do they have standing? [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
His decision would have allowed virtually anyone to object to FDA approval of any drug, for any reason. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm
This judgment from the General Court is in line with case SRB v EDPS discussed here (see also Spajic) where the General Court held that although when data could be considered as pseudonymised (and thus personal data according to the EDPS) one had to consider whether the recipient of that data could (reasonably and lawfully) get the additional information needed to re-identify them in order to qualify data as personal. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Missouri, Justice Jackson repeatedly attempted to turn the focus away from the issues on which the advocates and other Justices mostly focused--whether any plaintiff has standing and whether the government's jawboning of social media companies regarding anti-vax disinformation, election denialism, and other harmful content rendered those companies' actions with respect to users "state action" subject to the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
Defense attorney: Objection, your Honor! [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
Together, then, these strands of text, intent/objectives, and application, then must be built into commentary. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
For this reason, National Guard troops often play critical law enforcement roles in the wake of natural disasters. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
With regard to the Objectors, she obtained confirmation from Mr William Nye, Secretary General of the Archbishops’ Council that the Revd Dr Ian Paul was not “acting as a representative of the Archbishop’s Council or with their knowledge”; and was “not persuaded to set aside or vary the Deputy Chancellor’s order on [his] standing”. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Otherwise, the obligation to carry lies will stand as a deterrent against carrying truthful factual reporting. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
But Colorado is not requiring that ballot exclusion in order to prevent Trump from serving as President, or in order to “enforce” Section 3 in any other way. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
For that reason, and others, we maintain that Justice Scalia erred, because there are no "Officers of the United States" appointed outside Article II, Section 2. [read post]
