Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
First, she considers Mazars, which involved the House Committees' subpoenas. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
They relied heavily on prior decisions that presidents are not immune from legal process—stretching back to the enforcement of a subpoena for President Jefferson’s documents in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, and including the decisions in the Nixon tapes case and the civil lawsuit that Paula Jones brought against President Clinton. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Nixon. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
The question is, is there a limit to the authority that we're advocating here under the commerce power? [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Vance, President Donald Trump’s efforts to shield his financial records, including his tax returns, from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders by a New York grand jury and three congressional committees. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
” Additionally, the court notes that, under In re: Sealed Case, a lower court’s determination will be reversed only if there is abuse of discretion. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:51 am
He said the Nixon precedent does not apply because challenges to the congressional subpoenas of officials in the Nixon administration were litigated in the courts, whereas the subpoenas of Trump administration officials were dealt with by the legislature. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
You’re messing with our interests. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:56 am
And even when subpoenas are honored, probative information is seldom revealed. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:13 am
“Can we agree, as, again, was done under Clinton and I think would've been done under Nixon? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
But, as Martin London, a retired partner at Paul Weiss and once the principal lawyer for Nixon’s Vice President, Spiro Agnew, asks, what about the Chief Justice? [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
” The lawyer representing the Department of Justice eventually responded, “Not to my knowledge”—and then noted that he thought “the President would say, never before has Congress engaged in the sort of illegitimate things they’re doing. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
The ultimate guidance given the parties—as in the Nixon case—can preclude endless re-litigation. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
August 29, 2019, – NY DA serves subpoena on Mazars. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
Why not issue subpoenas to get key witnesses to testify? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox secured a grand jury subpoena requiring the President to produce even more of the tapes. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
Nixon for the claim that “such a subpoena is permissible only where there is a ‘demonstrated, specific need’ for the information sought. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
Hypothetical questions may seem pointless when you're at the podium, but they do give the Court a flavor about the consequences of your legal position. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
Or they've heard enough criticism about their partisan, secretive ways and they're yielding to pressure to legitimatize themselves. [read post]
