Search for: "In re: ADOPTION OF FINAL ORDER OF PROTECTION FORM" Results 21 - 40 of 1,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
The relevant skeletal form of claim 1, as proposed in the re-issue-->1. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:03 am by James Hamilton
Accordingly, almost every form of remuneration that takes into account the investments selected by participants and beneficiaries would likely violate the fee-leveling requirement of the final rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm by Addie Rolnick
More importantly, Justice Sotomayor points out that ICWA gave Brown a statutorily protected right to change his mind “up to the time a final decree of adoption was entered” and the petitioners agreed with the South Carolina Supreme Court that Brown had never given valid consent for Veronica’s adoption. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
The most publicized decision to come out of the SEC’s July 26th open meeting was the Commission’s adoption of final rules to remove references to credit ratings. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
In this final post in our Hunton & Williams Bermuda Form Arbitration Series, we discuss case law involving the Bermuda Form. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
Their use should be encouraged.Ironically, perhaps, while the adoption of such architectural form hearkened back to ancient Greece and Rome, it was essentially revolutionary, rather than conservative, in nature. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:37 pm by Juan Antunez
Goodman notified them of the adoption proceeding in January 2012, after the period to appeal the Final Judgment of Adult Adoption had expired. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Paul Staniland
A post-Trump foreign policy, they argue, needs to re-embrace the fundamentals of this order. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:13 pm by Scott Livingston
 PI Collection and Use Rules In its final form, the Internet Provisions reiterate most of the specific provisions relating to the collection and use of a user’s PI found in the draft for public comment (see our previous client alert on the draft here). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:29 am by Jennifer Barna
Finally, EO 152 supersedes certain prior Executive Orders to the extent they are inconsistent, including the portion of Executive Order 107 (“EO 107”) that prohibited gatherings. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Families may look different on the outside, but inside they're all the same -- they're made of people who care for and love one another. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
  (2)  Whether Section 242(a)(4) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act bars judicial review of claims under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment except in appeals from final orders of deportation, and if so construed, whether Section 242(a)(4) violates the Equal Protection Clause or the Suspension Clause. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:46 am by Dustin Lewis, Naz Modirzadeh
These concerns formed part of the reasoning reportedly put forward by the United States and Ireland to other members of the Council in a concept note supporting the resolution. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:06 am by Maksym Vishchyk
Most of all, such concessions would deliver a fatal and final blow to the contemporary world order, while inevitably paving the way to further armed conflict in Ukraine and beyond. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:23 am by Susan Hennessey
But despite the language of the final bill, the AIS Terms of Use actually adopt the tighter requirement: participants are obligated to remove “any information that can be used to identify specific persons reasonably believed to be unnecessary to describe or identify the cyber threat. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:10 am by Katitza Rodriguez
 But, in its current form, the draft convention’s human rights safeguards are simply not robust enough to protect against the misuse of personal data. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
This final part will analyze how the new order fares under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Jay Stanley
Therefore, just as with government surveillance of email communications, records associated with Google+ or Talk conversations are clearly protected by 18 USC 2703(c)(1), and their disclosure requires a court order. [read post]