Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products v."
Results 21 - 40
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
First of all, the Third Circuit made clear in its en banc decision in Dunn v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
There are established databases of identified specific sites and products containing asbestos fiber. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am
Krik v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
§ 11111(a)(2)/ [8] Fullerton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 10:28 am
The shoddy evidentiary foundations of many of the claims supported by CART are reminiscent of the fraud in In re Silica Products Liability Litigation, 398 F. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
All of the attempts to re-define their claims were unsuccessful. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am
Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J. 429, 479 A.2d 374 (1984). [13] In re Asbestos Litigation, 628 F.Supp. 774 (D.N.J.1986) (eight to six), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:01 am
Morin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
Super. 2004) (heeding presumption warranted only as to products that a plaintiff had no choice but to use), aff’d without opinion, 881 A.2d 1262 (Pa. 2005); Demmler v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:58 am
The losses related to liabilities on products such as silicon breast implants, products derived from contaminated blood and asbestos exposure. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:58 am
The losses related to liabilities on products such as silicon breast implants, products derived from contaminated blood and asbestos exposure. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
A couple of weeks ago – yeah, that’s right, on February 29 – the Supreme Court issued a ruling preempting asbestos product liability claims in Kurns v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Some Past Attempts to Remedy the Harm from Dubious Science in Products Cases GAF’s Litigation against the Asbestos Lawsuit Industry On January 10, 2001, G-I Holdings Inc., the successor to GAF Corporation (“GAF”), filed suit against a group of asbestos personal injury lawyers who it alleged had “orchestrated a scheme to inundate the judicial system with hundreds of thousands of asbestos cases without regard to their merit. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Shubin in an asbestos case again. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
“Bare Metal” Products at Issue In Air and Liquid Systems Corp v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
“Bare Metal” Products at Issue In Air and Liquid Systems Corp v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff perpetuated a good deal of mischief and misinformation to keep his myth that all fiber types are the same (and that “asbestos is asbestos is asbestos”). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
In so doing, the Court re-affirmed the general rules that a manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable for defects in another entity’s product, and that a manufacturer has no duty to warn of risks arising from another manufacturer’s products. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Co., 888 F.2d 45 (6th Cir. 1989) (applying Michigan law); In Re: Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products, 996 F. [read post]
