Search for: "In re: Boehm"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:55 am
My students sometimes ask me why we read dissents, since they're not the law. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Boehm and Michael D. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:13 pm
We’re excited to offer you the chance to hear from a host of experts on the field. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
The LAT's Mike Boehm reports that Clint Arthur's pointless lawsuit against Louis Vuitton has settled, "for a $12,000 refund, plus interest — what Louis Vuitton had offered before he sued. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:20 pm
If you're late to this whole story, Lindsay Pollock has the Cliff Notes version. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:02 am
"The majority reversed and remanded the Bartholomew Superior Court ruling, while Justice Ted Boehm concurred in result but has concerns about the statutes. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:02 am
"The decision leaves open the theoretical possibility that Arthur could re-file after he tenders - but that won't get him anywhere because, if he does, the museum will just refund his money, as they've been willing to do all along.So that leaves only his related federal lawsuit, which, for the reasons stated here, I suspect will meet a similar fate (and perhaps worse: there's a good chance Arthur is going to end up paying Louis Vuitton's legal fees).More here from… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:23 pm
” In balancing the needs of the child in this case, the held that none of the four reasons given by the trial court, “either alone or in conjunction with the court’s other reasons,” warranted a conclusion by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests.Justice Boehm dissented, stating the majority opinion should not have re-evaluated the trial… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:01 pm
I know those are the guidelines, and they're the guidelines I have always gone by, but sometimes one has to look at alternate possibilities .... [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:14 am
Rachel Matteo-Boehm, a partner in the San Francisco office of Holme, Roberts & Owen, is lead counsel for the two plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Boehm was appointed to the court by Evan Bayh; Shepard and Dickson by Gov. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
[Here are some of my thoughts; a Res Gestae paper may follow. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:56 pm
Boehm was appointed to the Supreme Court by Gov. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:47 pm
Boehm, J., concurs. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
., and Dickson, and Boehm, JJ., concur. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
State of Indiana, a 23-page, 3-2 opinion in a case argued 4/17/07, Justice Boehm writes:We hold that Litchfield v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
Boehm, J., concurs in the result. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
Shepard, C.J. and Dickson and Boehm, JJ., concur. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 8:17 am
., d/b/a Commercial Properties, an 8-page, 5-0 decision, Justice Boehm writes:We hold that a broker who breaches his fiduciary duty to disclose material information to his client loses his right to receive a commission for his services. * * * The trial court's order is reversed and the case is remanded with instructions to enter judgment ordering Minnick to assign to Nichols the note representing his commission and to disgorge to Nichols any payments received on that note, with… [read post]
