Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION"
Results 21 - 40
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm
New on the Short Circuit podcast: Texas drone privacy and an unparticular iCloud search. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The complaints against the digital leaders include allegations of (1) undermining traditional media; (2) violating user privacy and data security; (3) pirating third-party data from e-commerce suppliers to imitate, front-run, or otherwise undermine and displace such suppliers from their own product markets; (4) manipulating their platforms to favor their own products and services (“self-preferencing”); (5) expanding monopoly power by buying up “nascent competitors”… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Safeguards under the Investigatory Powers Act for journalistic material gathered in bulk by UK intelligence agencies will be re-examined in the High Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
See Douez v Facebook, Inc [2017] 1 SCR 751. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:32 am
In re: StubHub Refund Litigation, No. 22-15879 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
If you are an organization and you’re not already preparing for an increased focus on cybersecurity and related legal concerns, you’re late to the game. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 12:36 am
appeared first on William Jaksa Criminal Litigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
We’re lazy. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:54 am
Case citation: In re Vital Pharmaceutical, 2023 WL 3689540 (S.D. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The judgment was widely reported in the media, including on the BBC Website, the Guardian, and Reuters (but not in the Sun, which preferred a story about the house used in filming “Notting Hill“) The trial in the managed Mirror Phone Hacking Litigation continued last week before Fancourt J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am
Of course, the ongoing pressure from EFF’s litigation and that of others didn’t hurt either. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:47 am
Early Facebook users got a feed consisting solely of updates from the people they cared about, and promises of privacy. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
So we're good now? [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:33 am
(Financial Advisor IQ by Glenn Koch) In re: Facebook, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:33 am
(Financial Advisor IQ by Glenn Koch) In re: Facebook, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:33 am
(Financial Advisor IQ by Glenn Koch) In re: Facebook, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:33 am
(Financial Advisor IQ by Glenn Koch) In re: Facebook, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
And then we spent some time talking about the ethical, legal and privacy concerns. [read post]
