Search for: "In re A. F."
Results 21 - 40
of 23,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
In re Sarett, 327 F.2d 1005, 1014, 1015, 140 USPQ 474, 482, 483 (CCPA 1964). [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:54 am
However, if you’re already an F-1 visa holder, your visa can be issued anytime, given that you’re currently enrolled in an approved academic institution and SEVIS. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
In re Henze, 181 F.2d 196, 37 C.C.P.A. 1009,85 USPQ 261, (C.C.P.A. 1950); In re Hass, 141 F.2d 122, 127,130, 31 C.C.P.A. 895, 60 USPQ 544, 548, 552 (C.C.P.A. 1944).The burden then shifts to the applicant, who then can presentarguments and/or data to show that what appears to be obvious,is not in fact that, when the invention is looked at as a whole.In re Papesch, 315 F.2d 381, 50 C.C.P.A. 1084, 137 USPQ 43(C.C.P.A. 1963). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
See In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
The CAFC noted that on 12(b)(6) motions, the law of the regional circuit is applied, citing Phonometrics, 203 F.3d 790.The In re Garner case involved an issue of priority. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
It’s f–ked up, man. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:29 am
In re Mayne, 104 F.3d 1339, 1343 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 2:50 pm
See In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 990 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:36 pm
F is for FTE. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:12 am
The sixteen page document was signed by Johnny F. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
From the case:Since we have affirmed the rejections of claims 1, 3-5, 9, 16, 19, 20,22, and 23 that relied upon Boyles, Rivest, Fielding, and Anderson, it isunnecessary for us to reach the additional rejections of those claims relyingon different references.See In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2015, 1:03 am
And, you’re f–ked. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:54 am
In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1312 (Fed. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:52 am
Estates and trusts — Administrative account — Exceptions Appellant Thomas F. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255 (CCPA 1977). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:01 am
The post IN RE: JOHN ANDERSON first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
See In re Warner , 379 F.2d 1011, 1017 (CCPA 1967) [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:53 am
” In re Suitco Surface, Inc., 603 F.3d 1255, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:34 pm
In re Bigio, 381 F.3d 1320, 1325 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:06 pm
Note that the Wyeth decision of the CAFC on June 26, 2013 cites to In re Vaeck, which deals with cyanobacteria:Finally, in In re Vaeck, weaffirmed the PTO’s nonenablement rejection of claimsreciting heterologous gene expression in as many as 150genera of cyanobacteria. 947 F.2d 488, 495–96 (Fed. [read post]
