Search for: "In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 9:12 am
Of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522, 107 S.Ct. 2542, 96 L.Ed.2d 461 (1987), which addressed the issue of the applicability of the Hague Evidence Convention in U.S. proceedings, weighed in favor of using the Hague Procedures or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
In this, there was an issue that the patent applicant had presented only arguments of counsel, with the examiner citing to In re Huang, 100 F.3d 136, 139 (CAFC 1996 ) and In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705 (CAFC 1984 ). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
Discovery (foreign company): Evidence (foreign court): 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 5:59 am
As construed by the Supreme Court, § 1782 "authorizes, but does not require" a district court to permit discovery for use in a foreign proceeding. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re Application of Chevron Corp. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:20 am
In In re John Doe a/k/a “Trooper”, the Texas Supreme Court limited the reach of Rule 202 pre-suit depositions by holding that the trial court in a Rule 202 proceeding must have personal jurisdiction over not only the respondent (the party whose deposition is sought), but, if applicable, also over the subject(s) of the pre-suit investigation about whom the respondent is expected to be deposed. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am
The statute permits a US court to grant judicial assistance pursuant to a letter rogatory issued, or request made, by a foreign or international tribunal or upon the application of any interested person … So Ghana must be proceeding as an “interested person. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 6:13 am
New York City, September 2007 To get a real flavor of how comprehensive the volume is, I'll list just a very few of its 28 chapter headings: Securing US Jurisdiction The Role of Comity Choice of Law Discovery Abroad for US Proceedings Discovery in the US In Aid of Proceedings Outside US Privilege Issues Cross-Border Legal Ethics Extraterritorial Application of US Laws (Employment and… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
The court held that because the time to appeal in Ecuador had not expired and because an appeal was in fact to be filed, there was still a foreign proceeding that served as an adequate predicate for the application. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Nov. 28, 1988) (finding the Attorney General of Bermuda was an interested person because he had a reasonable interest in obtaining the discovery and was empowered by Bermuda’s law to represent the state in the foreign proceeding at issue); In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 648 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Nov. 28, 1988) (finding the Attorney General of Bermuda was an interested person because he had a reasonable interest in obtaining the discovery and was empowered by Bermuda’s law to represent the state in the foreign proceeding at issue); In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 648 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Nov. 28, 1988) (finding the Attorney General of Bermuda was an interested person because he had a reasonable interest in obtaining the discovery and was empowered by Bermuda’s law to represent the state in the foreign proceeding at issue); In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 648 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Nov. 28, 1988) (finding the Attorney General of Bermuda was an interested person because he had a reasonable interest in obtaining the discovery and was empowered by Bermuda’s law to represent the state in the foreign proceeding at issue); In re Request for Assistance from Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago, 648 F. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
See Use of North Carolina Subpoena to Obtain Documents from Foreign Entity or Individual, 2014 Formal Ethics Opinion 7 (2014). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
(d) the mere discovery of a new form of a known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance or the mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance or of the mere use of a known process, machine or apparatus unless such known process results in a new product or employs at least one new reactant. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Recently, an application was filed requesting that a Judicial Council Coordinated Proceedings (“JCCP”) be established in state court for the coordination of Xarelto lawsuits in that state. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 102(g) between applications or patents, the conflict could be resolved using an interference proceeding. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Aikens testified that he was finally able to correct and confirm the error when he obtained the Japanese Priority Application. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
” This conclusion is erroneous because it ignores ALDF’s admission that such a conclusion is limited by “courts [which] have recognized foreign litigants as ‘interested persons’ for the purpose of obtaining Section 1782 discovery even if they would not be recognized as persons in our domestic legal system for other purposes . . . [read post]
