Search for: "In re CDR"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
They’re a window onto future inequality, too. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
They’re a window onto future inequality, too. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm
“We’re just clicking off milestones. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
Al-Nashiri’s lawyers immediately cried foul, and asked to re-open ripe, undecided motions that Judge Pohl took with him, notwithstanding his replacement by Judge Vance. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:27 pm
Unfortunately, the wording of the House's USA FREEDOM Act could be seen as codifying these about searches—something we’re particularly concerned about. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 11:19 am
And they’re all too busy drowning, going off sick and seeking a career change by the sea. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:18 am
Over to trial counsel CDR Andrea Lockhart. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
Prosecutor CDR Andrea Lockhart says recusal is inappropriate and unnecessary. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
Judge Pohl asks CDR Brian Mizer about the legal requirement of credit for pre-trial confinement. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
We’re talking big-time unfairness here, your honor. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:40 pm
Judge Pohl: you’re relying on Hamdan II? [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:46 am
Aaaaand we’re back. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
Second in our re-direct sequence is KSM lawyer David Nevin. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
These prompt the court to re-jigger a bit. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
In particular, the court explained what was meant by “use” in the sense of Article 25 (1) (e) CDR which “does not necessarily presuppose a full and detailed reproduction of an earlier distinctive sign in a subsequent Community design. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:56 am
Will he have any re-direct? [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
And … we’re back. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
CDR Walter Ruiz, Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s lawyer, joins in Bormann’s objection. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
Power-One, 599 F.3d at 1351.The obviousness analysis here asks whether a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention— an electrical engineer with at least a bachelor’s degree and several years of CDR experience—would have had a reason to modify Pickering to include a “data path. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
Mark Martins, objects to a re-jiggering of the court’s planned agenda, but he won’t object to ex parte submissions—provided these don’t cut today’s adversarial session short. [read post]
