Search for: "In re Gipson"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 3:00 am
“You’re standing at the source, baby. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
Following re-sentencing, Franklin again appealed, arguing that his re-sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment right to fact finding by a jury. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:26 am
"Said Gipson, who has represented Missouri inmates appealing death sentences, "It sounds to me that if that's the best they can do, that's sort of a sad commentary on how the department does business. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Thanks to Kent Piacenti for re-upping to do a few more installments. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
This time, we don’t care much about the peculiar facts, but rather we’re directing ourselves to the court’s odd reasoning that somehow there’s a conflict between the learned intermediary rule (adopted at some level now in everyAmerican jurisdiction – see our “headcount” post here − and the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (“UCATA”). [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
