Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 21 - 40
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2007, 3:05 pm
In In re J-Y-C-, 24 IN Dec. 260 (BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3576 (August 9, 2007), the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled (1) Under section 101(a)(3) of the REAL ID Act of 2005, Div. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
The Law Professor Blogs Network is thrilled to announce the launch/re-launch of four blogs: Business Law Prof Blog, by C. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
If you have questions, let me know and download my free Bankruptcy e-book while you're at it. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:12 am
[name]: Bearheart, S Bugg, CElmer, E Emery, D Larsen, L Oustigoff, L Oustigoff, N Peterson, C Taylor, J Taylor, K Taylor, L Related post here. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 11:26 am
C-10-0117 SI (N.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
David C. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:26 am
La communauté de blogueurs vient de perdre un des piliers de la blogosphère, Renée Whatelet, décédée au Mexique.La société perd une solide expertise du Mexique et du développement de marché. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Ultimately, however, C&J shareholders were exchanging 100% ownership of C&J for 47% control in the post-merger entity. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
The 1980 film "The Formula" had Marlon Brando as the evil oil company exec and George C. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:55 am
The opinion in Ex Parte Nancy C. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 4:31 am
., No. 99 C 626 (N.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:57 pm
In this live stream, attorney Jacob J. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This request was ultimately denied by the Legal Board of Appeal (decision J 1/11), essentially because by the time the request for correction had been filed notice of the withdrawal had already been recorded in the European Patent Register (on February 6, 2009). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:52 am
J.) [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am
” 23.107(c)(2) (emphasis added). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
This means that the receiving Office (RO) ascertains whether the failure to file the international application within the priority period- occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having been taken ("due care" criterion), or- was unintentional ("unintentional" criterion).Rule 49ter.1 PCT foresees in its paragraph (a) that, where the RO has restored a right of priority under the "due care" criterion, that restoration must, subject to its paragraph… [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:15 am
P. 12(c)), based upon the recent decision in Interscope v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:17 am
J’avais en effet envie d’avoir une structure plus professionnelle, sans publicité et plus respectueuse de la sphère... [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:15 pm
(in Cyberwar: Law & Ethics for Virtual Conflicts, J. [read post]
