Search for: "In re J.C-A." Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As businesses re-open, re-orient, and try to move on, there undoubtedly will be some that will stumble or that will become overly optimistic about their prospects and attract the unwanted attention of the plaintiffs’ lawyers. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 11:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If you're not satisfied in the end, you can have a full refund.Rangers not Texas' earliest law enforcement. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
“We’re doing our fair share for trying to keep this world as normal as we can. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
“We’re doing our fair share for trying to keep this world as normal as we can. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 11:07 am by Sandy T. Fox
The trial judge said that Florida law presumes the younger two to be the legal children of S.M. and J.C. because the children were born into the intact marriage of S.M. and J.C. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
”  If you’re not paying attention, California’s  law sounds a lot like the FTC’s regulation, right? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
Sugarman, “The Re-emergence of Silica Litigation and the Theories of Liability Under Which it is Litigated,” HarrisMartin (Feb. 24, 2004); Thomas A Gilligan, Jr., “Is Silica The Next Asbestos? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Ryan Gabrielson ProPublica Originally published at ProPublica January 17 , 2019 At the FBI Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, a team of about a half-dozen technicians analyzes pictures down to their pixels, trying to determine if the faces, hands, clothes or cars of suspects match images collected by investigators from cameras at crime scenes. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:26 am by Jacquelyn Greene
For example, written findings in In re J.C. 195 N.C.App. 785 (March 17, 2009) that included place of commitment, acknowledgement that the juvenile had made progress in the MRT program, and that the juvenile was fingerprinted and photographed and entered a notice of appeal were not sufficient because they did not address any of the five statutory factors. [read post]