Search for: "In re Kennard" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 12:56 pm by Brad Pauley
County of Los Angeles, S201348—Review Denied [Kennard and Werdegar, JJ., voting for review]—May 9, 2012. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:27 pm by Brad Pauley
In re Cipro Cases I & II, S198616—Review Granted—February 15, 2012  The question presented is whether a suit may be brought under the Cartwright Antitrust Act to challenge “reverse exclusionary payments” made by pharmaceutical manufacturers to settle patent litigation with generic drug producers and prolong the life of the patents in question. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by Larry Downes
I’ve written several articles in the last few weeks critical of the dangerously unprincipled turn at the Federal Communications Commission toward a quixotic, political agenda. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
I say this, by the way, notwithstanding the fact that in today's cases, you actually have disagreement; in one case, by Justice Werdegar, and in the other, by Justice Kennard. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm by Brad Pauley
In re N.M., S195757—Review Denied [Kennard, J., voting for review]—September 28, 2011 This was a child dependency proceeding initiated by a county Health and Human Services Agency. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:11 pm by Los Angeles Lawyer
Talk to a personal injury attorney as soon as you’re able if you or a loved one was hurt in an accident or by a defective/dangerous product. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by Brad Pauley
  Review Denied (with dissenting justices) In re E.P., B224049, Review Denied [Kennard, J., voting for review]—April 20, 2011. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
  With Justices Kennard and Moreno dissenting.Remember that rule the next time you're thinking about calling 911. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:29 am by Steven Drizin
 Unfortunately, he was removed from the boot camp for non-compliance and re-sentenced to serve fifteen years. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:32 pm by Cal Law
“So we’re back to a five-person, all-male court,” George announced jollily. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Taylor
One judge, Justice Joyce Kennard, dissented from the majority opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office)   Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP)   Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46)   South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
  In her concurring opinion, Justice Joyce Kennard stressed the limited role of the court and the broad right of the electorate to amend the constitution. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:49 am
  Justice Kennard concurred and Justice Werdegar concurred in the judgment (disagreeing with the majority's amendment-revision analysis but agreeing with the result). [read post]