Search for: "In re L.J., Jr."
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Atkinson, Jr., Florida State University College of Law, has published and is publishing:Growing Up With Scott and Atticus: Getting From "To Kill a Mockingbird" Through "Got Set a Watchman," 65 Duke L.J. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Atkinson, Jr., Florida State University College of Law, has published and is publishing:Growing Up With Scott and Atticus: Getting From "To Kill a Mockingbird" Through "Got Set a Watchman," 65 Duke L.J. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
Bellia Jr., Article III and the Cause of Action, 89 IOWA L. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Matthews, Jr. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Matthews, Jr. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Coffee Jr. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Prior Patently-O Patent L.J. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
Matthews, Jr. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Matthews, Jr. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
In re Pirelli Tire, L.L.C., 247 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. 2007). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
Matthews, Jr. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Koch Jr. 2016 treatise update of 4 Admin. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
Matthews, Jr., When Multiple Plaintiffs/Relators Sue for the Same Act of Patent False Marking, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 95 (matthews.falsemarking.pdf) Kristen Osenga, The Patent Office’s Fast Track Will Not Take Us in the Right Direction, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 89 (Osenga.pdf) Peter S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:59 am
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Compare In re Zoloft (Setraline Hydrochloride) Products, 26 F. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Henderson, Jr. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, notice)In re G.C., Jr. [read post]
