Search for: "In re Matthew S. (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This was a real concern at the time because the CRA was adopted in 1996, before United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 7:51 am by Patrick Hulme
The Last Repeal: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution The Biden team’s convenient switch in legal theory away from AUMF(s) is reminiscent of the last time a high-profile force authorization was faced with imminent repeal—the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution nearly 50 years ago. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:47 pm by Tia Sewell
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Matthew J. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Becerra, Ninth Circuit] California’s legislature has long been itching to gut or repeal Proposition 109 (1996), in which voters banned race and sex preferences. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 12:12 pm by Elliot Setzer
If we’re lucky enough to hire you, you’ll be a part of the Center’s four-person leadership team, where you’ll help shape the Center’s overall programming and strategy. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:09 am by Chris Castle
  This post started as a Twitter thread, and we’re very pleased that Carrie agreed to let us post it as an article. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:29 pm by Schachtman
Matthew 23:24 To capture the state of the art, or the state of correct and flawed interpretations of the ASA Statement, reviewing a recent but now resolved, large so-called mass tort may be illustrative. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:52 am by Administrator
Matthews Memorial Hospital Assn.) v. [read post]