Search for: "In re Michael H., Jr., et al."
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
[et al.].St. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
For that matter, Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, as well as Justice Brown Jackson (while a federal judge), use those canons with increasing frequency in statutory interpretation cases as well.[17]Recognizing that fact, Justice Elena Kagan and a leading nontextualist scholar of statutory interpretation, Professor William Eskridge, have quipped, “[w]e’re all textualists now” (well, before walking that statement back in dissent to this past Term’s environmental… [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael Bradley, Jr. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
SCHILL Linking Private and Public International Law: the Example of Determining Corporate Nationality in Germany’s Investment Treaty Network Anja SEIBERT-FOHR La fonction et le contenu de la dignité humaine en droit international Dennis SOLOMON Internationale Entscheidungskollisionen zwischen staatlicher Gerichtsbarkeit und privater Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Andreas SPICKHOFF Gerichtsstände und grenzüberschreitender Autokauf im Internet Michael STÜRNER… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Michael A. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. 1st District.Bankruptcy -- Dismissal -- Chapter 7 -- Abuse -- Dismissal of Chapter 7 case as an abusive filing is warranted where presumption of abuse arises pursuant to section 707(b)(2), the presumption is not rebutted by special circumstances, and totality of debtors' financial situation demonstrates abuse pursuant to Section 707(b)(3)(B) -- Monthly expenses for mortgage payments on surrendered property and student loan debt are not allowable… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:49 pm
(April 20, 2011); Michael H. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Logan H. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Sugarman, “The Re-emergence of Silica Litigation and the Theories of Liability Under Which it is Litigated,” HarrisMartin (Feb. 24, 2004); Thomas A Gilligan, Jr., “Is Silica The Next Asbestos? [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Dees III, Stewart H. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Michael J. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
And then there were others, too. [1] See “Skappology” (May 26, 2020); “SKAPP A LOT” (April 30, 2010); “Manufacturing Certainty” (Oct. 25, 2011); “David Michaels’ Public Relations Problem” (Dec. 2, 2011); “Conflicted Public Interest Groups” (Nov. 3, 2013). [2] See, e.g., “Legal Remedies for Suspect Medical Science in Products Cases – Part One” (June 2, 2020); “Part Two” (June 3, 2020);… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
