Search for: "In re Opinion of the Judges v Nichols"
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
Here are some excerpts from that opinion, Nichols v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
While it is true that, over the past 50 years, some judges have expressed the strong view that exemplary damages are an anomaly which should no longer form part of the civil law, the balance of opinion has been to the opposite effect. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Arnstein v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:07 am
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 pm
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
– Federal Government Secretly Monitored Personal Webmail - bit.ly/woSX37 (Peter Vogel) “Judge Peck Approves a Discovery Process That Includes the Application of Predictive Coding” http://bit.ly/w6I7sW (Fulbright Briefing) Judge Peck’s Predictive Coding Opinion – Reporting The Reaction - bit.ly/yuoul2 (Chris Dale) Jurors All “Atwitter” – bit.ly/wOXGo7 (John Patzakis) Lessons Learned From Predictive… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Nichols. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
For instance, Judge Hand’s complaints about the “literary critic” expert witness in Nichols, have been re-lodged against witnesses with expertise in ethics. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Nichols, 94 F.3d 1187 (U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Admit it, my fellow citizens of Pennsylvania: you’re clueless who is running for judge. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
In WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Eastman Chemical (CAFC 2010-1249) precedential; Judges Rader (author), Lourie, Whyte Best Mode This court reviews a grant of summary judgment without deference. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
” The Court of Appeal agreed with the judge that the last passage from Reynolds had to be revised: [2010] EMLR 26 at [21]:- “..although the point was not mentioned in Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, I agree with the Judge (at … paragraph 146) that the last sentence in the passage quoted above .. from Lord Nicholls’s opinion cannot stand following the 1998 Act: it is clear from In re S .. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
The rule has been disapplied in “Reynolds/Jameel” cases, because of the need to make that defence practical and effective: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC at [21-22] (Lord Nicholls). [read post]
