Search for: "In the Interest of: C.P. (Complete Opinion)" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
If there had been a third opinion, maybe we'd call this a trilogy. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Since there were too many cases of interest to blog about separately, we’re doing the next best thing, which is to give our readers a rundown of what’s left on the agenda.Although the word “preemption” was never uttered in the opinion, the decision in Bennett v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
Indeed, the court found “persuasive public-interest reasons” to support disclosure, including providing the FDA and the EMA a complete, unvarnished view of Zambelli-Weiner’s research.[5] Of course, the plaintiffs’ counsel, in close concert with Zambelli-Weiner, had created GSK’s need for the documents. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
According to the Weiss opinion, Kentucky falls into the third category. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am by Steven Ballard
 I had expected, like my colleague Jonathan Eaton, the Court to rule differently, or for at least some of the justices to offer a dissenting opinion. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Cardozo, Values (1944) Yet other Justices had interests in law and medicine: Benjamin N. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
, 533 U.S. 27 (2001).We must construe the 4th Amendment `in [ ] light of what was deemed an unreasonable search and seizure when it was adopted, and in a manner which will conserve public interests as well as the interests and rights of individual citizens. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
Wright involved Texas plaintiffs, but change "Texas" to "Georgia" and you end up with an almost complete transposition of the Wright court's reasoning into the Hunter decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am by Durga Rao
Extract of Judgment: BEFORE THE COMPANY LAW BOARD PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI C.P. [read post]