Search for: "In the Matter of a Petition for Determination of an Appropriate Unit and Certification as Exclusive Representative"
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
BACKGROUND On October 20, 2015, the Attorney General of Florida petitioned this Court for an opinion as to the validity of an initiative petition sponsored by People United for Medical Marijuana and circulated pursuant to article XI, section 3 of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
Supp. 2d 18, 21, 25, 30 (D.D.C. 2012), the quickie election rule as finalized by the NLRB among other things requires that: Union elections generally be held within 10 to 21 days after the petition filing, rather than the previous rule’s 42 days; Any pre-election hearings occur eight days after the petition filing; Employers to file before the pre-election hearing a position statement addressing threshold issues such as unit appropriateness, bargaining… [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
The location where one party resides determines whether a filing in the east Division is appropriate. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
Kenneth Vercammen's Law office represents individuals charged with criminal and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
" On Jan. 7, 2008, the Respondent received a petition from a majority of unit members stating that they no longer wished to be represented by the Union. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
A mere petition for asylum does not trigger this. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
This provision is currently the subject of a Petition for Review filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
In Matter of Leroy v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:49 am
A public officer may be removed from his or her office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 Abolishing a position in the public service and the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency Abolition of positions and the assignment of former teaching duties to other teachers Absence of any reference to the benefit claimed in the collective bargaining agreement defeats the employee organization's breach of contract allegation Absence of the individual who rated the employee unsatisfactory from the… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
"Now, Sasha (not her real name) is simply wrong, as a matter of law; her pitchfork won't penetrate the automatic stay. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
As of January 5, 2018, Francis was being held by ICE at the Bergen County Jail in Hackensack, New Jersey, pending removal proceedings in Immigration Court.The Mootness ExceptionThe verified petition, dated December 11, 2017, requested the immediate release of Francis and a declaration that his detention was [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
First, though it only requires four votes for the Court to take up a case, it takes five votes to determine the outcome. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2 and 2005-3.C.A. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Since filing the petition, however, Mr. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
The proposed class representative, Saliha Madden, alle [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
In California (and for that matter, throughout the United States), FDNS officers always appear unannounced at businesses and demand that employers provide them with access to nonpublic worksite areas and access to specific employees, while proffering nothing more “official” than the enforcement agent’s business card. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
In California (and for that matter, throughout the United States), FDNS officers always appear unannounced at businesses and demand that employers provide them with access to nonpublic worksite areas and access to specific employees, while proffering nothing more “official” than the enforcement agent’s business card. [read post]
