Search for: "J. B. Floyd" Results 21 - 40 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
If that is proved, then the offence of rape is made out; or (b) if an absence of belief by the Claimant is not proved, that any such belief was unreasonable. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
For completeness, Arnold J considered the points on fair share. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
 Floyd J referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on whether streaming constituted a "communication to the public". [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Brian Cordery
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
  VEGF Trap Eye Floyd J’s decision was in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG v Genentech Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The unusual posture in which Floyd raised his Batson and J. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
 Finally Floyd J considered that there was no basis on which the fixture lists could attract copyright protection beyond the selection and arrangement of data. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
With the skilled addressee and specification out of the way, Floyd J was tasked with determining what Virgin's 908 patent meant. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
It didn't help, however, in this case that some of the claims were apparently (in the words of Floyd J) "very poorly drafted", making the task of figuring out what they meant even more difficult than usual. [read post]