Search for: "J. Skinner" Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ziegler, Abortion-Eugenics Discourse in Dobbs: A Social Movement History, (2 J. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm
Shagan, University of California, BerkeleyBarbara J Shapiro, University of California, BerkeleyJames Sharpe, University of YorkQuentin Skinner, Queen Mary University of LondonNigel Smith, Princeton UniversityVirginia Strain, Loyola University of ChicagoTim Stretton, Saint Mary's UniversityHenry S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm by Christine Corcos
Shagan, University of California, BerkeleyBarbara J Shapiro, University of California, BerkeleyJames Sharpe, University of YorkQuentin Skinner, Queen Mary University of LondonNigel Smith, Princeton UniversityVirginia Strain, Loyola University of ChicagoTim Stretton, Saint Mary's UniversityHenry S. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:46 pm by Howard Friedman
, 29 Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights and Social Justice 69-110 (2022).Shlomo Pill & Ariel J. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:05 am by Keith R. McMurdy
In March of this year, the 9th Circuit looked at a similar case, Skinner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:38 am by Glenn Cohen
Still other readings are possible: See, e.g., Carl Wellman, MEDICAL LAW AND MORAL RIGHTS 145-46 (2005) (reading Skinner as limited to marriage); Carter J. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
” Accordingly, Mitting J found the Home Office liable to all six claimants in both misuse of private information and for breach of the 1998 Act. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In relation to qualified privilege, Tugendhat J ruled ([2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)), in relation to publication of both the email and the VPR that publication to employees of the Council who were “customer facing staff” that may come in to contact with Ms Clift was protected, but that publication to employees in other council departments or to any external “partner organisations”, was not, since it was not reasonable to conclude that any risk existed to those individuals. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of October 17, 2022 from Wise Law on Twitter:Five things to know as the Emergencies Act public inquiry gets underway 80-year-old facing $23K bill after racing pigeons were seized while he was in hospitalWhat you need to know about the new credit card surchargeAndrea Skinner, Hockey Canada’s interim chair, resigns from positionOntario employers need 'electronic monitoring' policies soon | CTV NewsHow do asylum seekers… [read post]