Search for: "JOHNSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE" Results 21 - 40 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
It was reported by the Press Gazette that the Independent, which closed its print editions in 2016, has grown its revenues by 11.5 per cent in a year. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm by Benjamin Beaton
Internal Revenue Service, Judge Clay, joined by Judge Suhrheinrich, held that the Anti-Injunction Act bars CIC Services from challenging IRS guidance that categorizes some in-house insurance companies as tax shelters, which must be disclosed. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Lauren Kuley
Internal Revenue Service, Judge Clay, joined by Judge Suhrheinrich, held that the Anti-Injunction Act bars CIC Services from challenging IRS guidance that categorizes some in-house insurance companies as tax shelters, which must be disclosed. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:10 pm by Martin H. Orlick
Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040, which was filed with the Internal Revenue Service and was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury, and which he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that he knew that he received more taxable income than he reported…” Counts 2 and 3 accuse Johnson of the same violations for tax years 2013 and 2014 respectively. [read post]
Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040, which was filed with the Internal Revenue Service and was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury, and which he did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that he knew that he received more taxable income than he reported…” Counts 2 and 3 accuse Johnson of the same violations for tax years 2013 and 2014 respectively. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
According to the Internal Revenue Service, for those who received a refund this year that refund averaged to about $3,000 per person. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Plaintiffs request that the Court take judicial notice of various documents related to litigation in Washington and Delaware, unpublished cases, and a page from the Washington Department of Revenue website. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 70 AD3d 438, 438 (1st Dept 2010); Johnson v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Matthew D. Lee
Judge Holmes also presided over the lengthy trial involving a dispute between the Internal Revenue Service and the estate of pop star Michael Jackson, and practitioners are eagerly awaiting his decision in this closely-watched case. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
A final rule (the Fiduciary Rule) promulgated by the Department of Labor in April 2016 expanding the definition of “investment advice fiduciary” conflicts with the text of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code and is unreasonable under Chevron and the APA, the Fifth Circuit has held. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am by CFM Admin
Keynote speakers are John Burbank of Passport Capital and Mark Yusko of Morgan Creek Capital Management, with opening remarks from Corey Johnson of Ripple and closing remarks by Don Wilson of DRW. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
She also suffers complications of sickle-cell disease, including avascular necrosis in both hips and gallbladder disease.Access is a non-profit corporation operating exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of post-secondary education institutions. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and to “clarify that no agency may use presumptions to penalize actions that are authorized by the express terms of that agency’s own regulations. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  The report noted that Internal Revenue Code § 7433 provides that a taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the Federal Government if an officer or employee of the IRS recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of the Internal Revenue Code or related regulation in connection with the collection of Federal tax. [read post]