Search for: "Jackson, Jr. v. State of Florida"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Alabama (docket 10-9646) and Jackson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:42 pm
See Jackson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
James Gallaher, Jr., 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Program and Jackson H. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Helping Family Voices address these challenges are partners at the state Title V/CSHCN agency, the Children's Hospital, Agenda for Children, MCH, the UAP, and the Academy of Pediatrics. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Jackson Jr. reportedly said. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:43 am
Alabama (10-9646) and Jackson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Florida (1996), the Secretary of the Interior may establish procedures for Indian gaming if a state declines to enter a compact with the Tribe and invokes immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Jackson and Yasmin Dawood, eds., Constitutionalism and a Right to Effective Government? [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
But Florida lawyer Steven I. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
