Search for: "Jackson v. Rich" Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2023, 8:49 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Judge Giles Sutherland Rich, famous for many things (including being the principal author of the 1952 Patent Act and in particular Section 103, which cabined at least for a while the Supreme Court’s penchant for invalidating patents to such an extent that Justice Jackson remarked that the only valid patent was one the Court had not had an opportunity to invalidate, Jungersen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm by Richard Hunt
 As Justice Jackson commented in a related context, judicial review serves “to correct wrong judgments, not to revise opinions. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by Hoi Kong
This SSRN paper (written after the draft opinion of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health was leaked but before the decision was published) is a rich exploration of issues in constitutional theory and an enormous contribution to the comparative constitutional law literature. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Whatever the merits of the different defamation cases against Belton and Burgis, the media must be free to examine the rich and powerful without fearing the chilling effect of prohibitively expensive legal action. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Courtney v Cayman News Service Ltd & Ors [2022] QSC 37 Jackson J dismissed an application for summary judgment by the plaintiff Canada CBC reports that a Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench judge has ordered CBC Manitoba to pay court costs to a Winnipeg man after finding its coverage about the man was defamatory. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Jackson Women’s Health Organization in December, the future of Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Each of them is fascinating on its own terms; I give them brief treatment only because there is such an embarrassment of riches this week. [read post]