Search for: "Jackson v. U.S. Postal Service"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
Historically, the postal service offered reduced rates as a very important subsidy for newspapers, magazines, and books; I believe such a subsidy still exists (under the rubric of “media mail”), though my sense is that it’s less important. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In contrast, he continued, the “bureaucracy at the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
” They include: Commodity Futures Trading Commission Department of Justice MIMF Unit Federal Bureau of Investigation Federal Trade Commission Internal Revenue Service Secret Service Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
(Gillette v Donahoe, April 8, 2014, Jackson, C). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service then intervened in an effort to get labor and management to agree. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
We figured we’d at least get some recognition for our poetry submissions, if not for explanatory reporting, public service, or even our editorial cartooning (what is with that pinkie, anyway?). [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Postal Service adopts final rule aimed at reducing postage fraud. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
Yet there are numerous provisions of the U.S. [read post]
