Search for: "Jaffe v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 5:13 am
United States, which held that the government was obliged to make certain disputed payments to health insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Jaffe’s statement well describes one of the signature accomplishments of modern environmental law in the United States: the use of citizen suits to guard against any shortfalls in the work of administrative agencies charged with administering the nation’s environmental protection laws. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
New Article: “It’s Not You, It’s Your Caseload”: Using Cronic to Solve Indigent Defense Underfunding
28 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
This Note argues that courts should utilize the procedural ineffectiveness presumption that the Supreme Court made available in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:04 am
Tarlowe +1-212-373-3035 rtarlowe@paulweiss.com Theodore V. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
” At National Review, Michael Brendan Dougherty explains why he has “started to think that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy may be the one man preventing the United States from political breakdown. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
If it says “freedom of speech,” that phrase has to be interpreted to make sense to the current citizens of the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:40 am
Kimes, 246 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2001) and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm
The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:50 am
Iowa, 854 N.W. 2d 1 (Iowa 2014) [3] Id. [4] In Jaffe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
Caveat Number Two: I speak here of the laws of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
Caveat Number Two: I speak here of the laws of the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:07 am
Caveat Number Two: I speak here of the laws of the United States. [read post]
