Search for: "Jerry W. Deal" Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This did not happened by accident, so there are lessons here for dealing with national GOP obstructionism as well. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
How, if at all, should we deal with concerns about overlap/cumulation of rights? [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Listen on mobile platforms:  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠ |  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠ Contact Us:  Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@gebauerm⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@glambert⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Threads: @glambertpod or @gebauerm66Email:… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am by mmoreland
Roosevelt’s controversial New Deal. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Parra gets a partial W, too:  his conviction for a 3rd degree felony possession and trafficking in Ecstasy is reduced to a 4th degree, which is a fairly big deal:  the former contains a mandatory term. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:43 pm
Brandeis School of Law · Founder and administrator of the Jurisdynamics Network, which includes the popular blog entitled Biolaw: Law and the Life Sciences (with Professor Andrew W. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Lowell Brown
John Charles “Charlie” Ginn, of McKinney, succeeded Jerry C. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm by LindaMBeale
States have a number of options for dealing with the demands. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
To deal with this scandal, Brooks and her boss, Les Hinton, ordered an internal investigation. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
This move is right out of Penn State’s playbook for dealing with the Jerry Sandusky victims, and it is a good one for some. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:50 am by Adam Thierer
But I’ll take that deal any day over the limited choices of the bygone scarcity era. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:55 pm by Joe Consumer
  As explained by Neema Singh Guliani, senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, A federal law wiping out — otherwise known as preempting — state protections would be a bad deal for consumers. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:55 pm by Joe Consumer
  As explained by Neema Singh Guliani, senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, A federal law wiping out — otherwise known as preempting — state protections would be a bad deal for consumers. [read post]