Search for: "John and Jane Does A; B; C; and D" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2019, 8:51 pm by Greg
Similarly, a person charged with a state jail felony prostitution case (who does does not a previous conviction for that state jail offense) must be placed on probation. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings Early analysis of the distribution of the corporate income tax relied on theoretical models and thought experiments. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the six judges who voted against the claimant (see 2.c and 2.d above) were 4-2 Democratic appointees. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:40 am by Andrew Sykes
If Jane Doe wrote a will in 2002 leaving her estate to persons A, B, and C, then wrote another will in 2012 (allegedly under undue influence) that leaves her entire estate to person D, then persons A, B, and C would have standing to challenge the 2012 will. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it your testimony that when John walked into your office on October 8, 2014, you had essentially prejudged his case before you even spoke to him? [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We ask “is this IP right invalid b/c it’s too broad” and “is the thing D is doing sufficiently similar to what P is doing” but generally not in an integrated proceeding “is the thing D is doing that P is doing the thing that can be controlled under this right? [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Bernardin allegedly thereby obtained access to Sewell's electronic communications and other personal information and sent messages purporting to be from her.On May 15, 2013, Sewell filed a separate suit against Bernardin's wife, Tara Bernardin, and `John Does # 1–5,’ apparently believing that Tara Bernardin and others unknown to her had gained access to her Internet accounts. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]