Search for: "Johnson v. Civil Service Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2019, 5:32 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:12 am
Janet Williams RICHMOND COUNTY Business Law Business Judgment Rule Applies to Condo Board Challenges; Court Will Not Second-Guess Board Graber v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:22 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
It’s never civil RICO. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Last Week in the Courts On 11 July 2022 Johnson J heard the trial of preliminary issues in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 4:55 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
Rivello Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
* The terms of the CBA continue in effect following the expiration of its term because the parties have not yet entered into a successor agreement (see Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]). [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Motion for Relief From Conviction Held Beyond Scope of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)
Yuzary v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
Sino’s Board of Directors consisted of a Chinese resident, Tianpeng Shao, who was managing director, CEO and Chairman of the board, and two Australian-resident non-executive directors, Andrew Faulkner and Wayne Johnson. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In the case of Gentry v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am
Board of Education and Meredith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Oct.4, 2012); Johnson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
Johnson, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Civil Service Law § 80 sets forth no such nondelegable duty pertinent to the provision at issue.Among other things, Civil Service Law § 80 establishes the manner in which suspensions and demotions must be implemented upon the abolition of positions (see Matter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
