Search for: "Johnson v. Warden"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
After Johnson, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
To the contrary, the Court cited Ylst approvingly in Richter, id., at 99-100, and did so again two years later in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) Warden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
LEXIS 87978 (SD CA, June 23, 2014), a California federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's complaint that the assistant warden would not authorize him to participate in the Ramadan fast.In Mohamad v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Marshall, Warden v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Johnson, 2012 U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:55 am
But the Court of Appeals reverses, reinstating the case.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
Two years later, a new warden took over and again began to enforce the policy. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
Second, Parker, Warden v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
In Parker, Warden v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 am
Bobby, Warden, 11-807, appears to be on hold for Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
Deborah Johnson is now the Warden at the central woman's prison, so she's the new defendant, replacing the old Deborah -- but with a different spelling -- Debra Jacquez. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
