Search for: "Joiner v. Joiner" Results 21 - 40 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The specific detail of the challenge may have shown that the witness had relied upon a study that was thoroughly flawed,[2] or that the witness relied upon an epidemiologic study of a type that cannot support a causal inference.[3] Rule 702 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Joiner make clear that the trial court must evaluate the expert witness’s application of methodology and whether it actually supports valid inferences leading to the witness’s claims and… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
Adverse event reporting is a recognized, important component of pharmacovigilence. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
That is behaviour which I would expect from a 21 year old joiner who was out of his depth but not what I would expect from the controlling mind of a company employing 20 people with a turnover of millions who was directing an established management team”. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by Schachtman
” The authors fail to mention that this dictum was abandoned in Joiner, and that it is specifically rejected by statute, in the 2000 revision to the Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
CONFOUNDING1 Back in 2000, several law professors wrote an essay, in which they detailed some of the problems courts experienced in expert witness gatekeeping. [read post]